Spatial history has been useful in telling stories throughout history because it lets people get an in-depth look at a specific topic from their sites. It is different in comparison to reading about history from the way online users can interact with the different topics that are on these websites. They can narrow down their findings to a specific subject that relates to any kind of research that they are planning for their projects. A disadvantage might be from how they could become bored or tired at looking at various projects that could be useful for their research.
Richard Pryor’s Peoria exemplifies the idea of spatial history from the way it lets their visitors on the website become associated with anything related to their topic. It offers insightful information about the many different themes that relate to the one broader topic that brings these ideas together. The site has images, maps, and texts that help the viewers of the website understand the content a bit more as they click on various subjects within the site.
The arguments that they are making relate to how people being involved in the sites can understand more visually than mentally. One of the readings for this week explains that spatial history is able to create arguments from they way a person can define their work that is involved in developing the projects. Sometimes people can learn more from visualizations that help them remember clearly and better than what words can do.
If I could do a spatial history, it would probably be about the many different relationships and collaborations that people in the film industry have with each other. People like directors, actors, and screenwriters have often worked together on a variety of movies throughout their film career. I somehow find it interesting in learning about the close work and connections these folks have in common. The spatial history would be an interactive map that outlines the many relationships that these people share from the film work.